The Indicator from Planet Money
ExplorePodcast overview and latest content
EpisodesBrowse the full episode archive
TopicsDiscover episodes by category
PostsBrowse published articles & write-ups

Podcast

  • Explore
  • Episodes
  • Topics
  • Posts

Recent Episodes

  • Want a 2.5% mortgage? Buy it.
  • The anxiety rattling China’s youth
  • Why Paramount went looney tunes for Warner Bros.
  • Should the families of organ donors be compensated?
  • ICE is bad for business, heat is bad for coffee, and sci-fi is bad for markets

Links

  • Apple Podcasts
  • Overcast

About

The Indicator from Planet Money

The Indicator from Planet Money

A bite-sized show about big ideas. From the people who make Planet Money, The Indicator helps you make sense of what's happening in today's economy. It's a quick hit of insight into money, work, and business. Monday through Friday, in 10 minutes or less.

Powered byPodRewind
    The Indicator from Planet Money
    Episode•August 5, 2025•8 min

    Can we still trust the monthly jobs report? (Update)

    Since his return to office, President Trump has waged something of a pressure campaign on economic data and the people in charge of delivering it. His firing of the Bureau of Labor Statistics commissioner following a weak jobs report now has some wondering: can we still trust the official numbers? Today on the show, we're resharing our conversation with former BLS commissioner, Erica Groshen on her current fears for the integrity of government data. The original version (https://www.npr.org/2025/03/07/1236538089/doge-gdp-bls-department-of-labor-jobs-report) of this story aired March 7, 2025. Related: What really goes on at the Bureau of Labor Statistics? (Update) (https://www.npr.org/2025/08/04/1256727558/trump-fires-bls-director-jobs-report) (Apple (https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-indicator-from-planet-money/id1320118593?i=1000720277395) / Spotify (https://open.spotify.com/episode/057UFl8X91tpCDfT9oGdzK?si=5dbfc7305e5a4a49)) Would you trust an economist with your economy? (https://www.npr.org/2025/08/01/1256575142/trust-economics-trump-bls-bureau-labor-statistics-jobs) (Apple (https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/planet-money/id290783428?i=1000720290749) / Spotify (https://open.spotify.com/episode/7J7g5dLgJbtUic6f4yCb9Z?si=526eb4a533254c9e)) For sponsor-free episodes of The Indicator from Planet Money, subscribe to Planet Money+ via Apple Podcasts or at plus.npr.org (http://plus.npr.org/). Fact-checking by Sierra Juarez (https://www.npr.org/people/g-s1-26724/sierra-juarez). Music by Drop Electric (https://dropelectric.bandcamp.com/). Find us: TikTok (https://www.tiktok.com/@planetmoney), Instagram (https://www.instagram.com/planetmoney/), Facebook (https://www.facebook.com/planetmoney), Newsletter (https://www.npr.org/newsletter/money). To manage podcast ad preferences, review the links below: See pcm.adswizz.com (https://pcm.adswizz.com) for information about our collection and use of personal data for sponsorship and to manage your podcast sponsorship preferences. Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoices (https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices) NPR Privacy Policy (https://www.npr.org/about-npr/179878450/privacy-policy)

    Apple PodcastsOvercast

    Transcript

    0:01
    Npr.
    0:11
    This is the indicator from Planet Money. I'm Darren Woods.
    0:14
    And I'm Waylon Wong. President Donald Trump said this week that he will soon announce his pick to lead the Bureau of Labor Statistics. He fired the previous head on Friday after accusing her of manipulating the jobs numbers.
    0:28
    The president presented no evidence that the jobs report is phony. Neither did Trump's economic adviser, Kevin Hassett, when he went on NBC's Meet the Press this week. Hassett told host Kristen Welker that the president wants his own people at the BLS.
    0:42
    Is the President planning to fire all 40 people involved in putting these numbers together?
    0:46
    We're going to try to get the numbers so that they're transparent and reliable.
    0:50
    Transparent and reliable data are vital to the economy. The monthly jobs report moves markets, the Federal Reserve, policymakers and everyday business the information to make decisions that affect all of us. So the numbers need to be trustworthy.
    1:06
    If people don't trust the data, then you might as well not produce it.
    1:12
    That's Erica Groschen, a former BLS commissioner. She was also part of a committee of outside experts that advise the government on economic data. The Trump administration disbanded that committee earlier this year.
    1:24
    We talked to Erica then about how we can trust official statistics like the monthly jobs report today. Today on the show, we are re airing our conversation about the safeguards that are in place and her worries about the future integrity of government data. The jobs report comes from two surveys that the BLS conducts and they are built on trust. The people who answer the survey questions trust that their responses will be anonymized and used only for statistical purposes. And then the people who use that data, from policymakers to investors, trust the quality of that information.
    2:00
    Erika Groschen served as BLS commissioner from 2013 to 2017. She says the BLS and other statistical agencies have a whole litany of procedures to safeguard this trust.
    2:14
    It's built into the directives on how you, how the statistical agencies operate. It's built into the law. It's built into this great publication called Principles and Practices for a Statistical Agency.
    2:28
    It's wonderful.
    2:30
    So it's front and present all the time, not because you're always fighting an active threat, but because everybody just knows that it's so important. The same way that people lock the door at night and do other things to make sure that they're warding off threats.
    2:48
    Here are some examples of those safeguards in practice. Erica says that when she was at the bls, only staffers tasked with data analysis could be in the rooms where that Work took place. Even the janitors couldn't get into those rooms to.
    3:04
    As commissioner, Erica would only see the jobs numbers when they were final. She also learned early on in her tenure that the report had to be written in the most neutral terms. No spin allowed.
    3:15
    When I gave a talk, I would show the proverbial glass with some water in it and say, what's the BLS answer? Is this half full or half empty?
    3:27
    What's your answer, Darian?
    3:28
    I know the exact answer to this. The BLS wants to say there is 150 milliliters of water here.
    3:34
    Oh, exactly right, Darian. Except, you know, Erica puts it in ounces.
    3:38
    Of course.
    3:39
    This is an 8 ounce vessel containing 4 ounces of liquid.
    3:44
    So congrats, Darian. You are qualified to write the monthly jobs report. You know, the language is boring by design.
    3:51
    It's fine if the releases are boring. What's not fine is if they have a political or policy slant to them.
    4:00
    Erica shared two big worries with us when it comes to the BLS and the integrity of the jobs data. The first one is manipulation. Basically, who gets access to the information and what they might do with it.
    4:14
    Erica says meddling could show up in different ways. For example, someone in the government could change the public release schedule either to bury bad news or announce good news at an opportunistic time.
    4:26
    If this happened, it would be a massive change in how the BLS currently operates. The agency publishes a schedule of its data releases well in advance. Everyone gets the numbers at the same time. And this is important because the jobs report moves.
    4:41
    The stock market hiccups in this process, even if they're not the result of malfeasance, make headlines. Like last year, a BLS data release didn't happen as scheduled. People from a couple investment banks then reportedly called the agency and got someone to tell them the numbers. This had other people in the market crying foul that some people got the information early and could potentially trade on it. The BLS said at the time that it was reviewing its procedures to make sure it wouldn't happen again.
    5:10
    Erica also flags another potential kind of manipulation, and that is changing how the BLS calculates the jobs numbers.
    5:18
    I worry about hubris that some person who feels they're very smart may feel, gee, the BLS shouldn't be doing it that way. They may have all their explanations for why they do it that way. But I'm smart and I think it should be done this way.
    5:35
    Oh, like I have a better formula for calculating the unemployment rate or something.
    5:39
    Exactly right.
    5:40
    Overseen how? The Commerce Secretary has his own idea about how to calculate gdp. He wants to take government spending out of the equation.
    5:48
    So between changing the release schedule or the equations, manipulation is one of Erica's big worries about the bls. Her second major concern is resources. According to one estimate, the Bureau's budget has shrunk over 10% since 2009 when adjusted for inflation.
    6:06
    And it takes a lot of resources, both money and people, to conduct the surveys that feed into the jobs report. And I've got to think that BLS staffers are taking note of the big cuts to federal workers.
    6:18
    Yeah, fewer people makes the job of collecting and analyzing survey data harder. And response rates for the surveys have already been declining. That's a problem because smaller sample sizes could lead to lower quality data with more errors. Erica says she has faith in the staffers at the bls, this group of dedicated data nerds who would raise the alarm about interference. She says vigilance is part of BLS agency culture and the norms that underpin its work. Still, those norms are vulnerable.
    6:49
    They can be undermined. It's like what parents tell their kids. Trust takes a long time to build up and. And it can be ruined in an instant.
    7:00
    Erica is co chair of a group called the Friends of the Bureau of Labour Statistics. Last week, the group issued a statement asking Congress to investigate Trump's firing of the BLS commissioner. It also said the President is engaging in, quote, unprecedented attacks on the independence and integrity of the federal statistical system.
    7:20
    Still, economic adviser Kevin Hassett has cast suspicion with no evidence on the large downward revisions in the latest jobs report. Tomorrow we'll take a look at how BLS revisions work and if the latest revisions were unusually large. This episode was produced by Julia Ritchie and Angel Carreras with engineering by Robert Rodriguez. It was fact checked by Sarah Juarez and Tyler Jones. Kate Concannon is the show's editor and the indicator is a production of npr.

    Can we still trust the monthly jobs report? (Update)

    0:00
    0:00

    Related Episodes

    Retirement luck, Hassett hassles the Fed, and boneless chicken in ... court?

    Retirement luck, Hassett hassles the Fed, and boneless chicken in ... court?

    Feb 20, 20269 min
    Retirement LuckStock Market ReturnsS&P 500
    Jobs numbers, immigrants in healthcare, and ... Jesus Christ?

    Jobs numbers, immigrants in healthcare, and ... Jesus Christ?

    Feb 13, 202610 min
    Jobs ReportBureau of Labor StatisticsHealthcare Jobs
    Just how bad are these job numbers?

    Just how bad are these job numbers?

    Feb 6, 20269 min
    Bureau of Labor StatisticsADPRevelio Labs
    Can Europe sell America?

    Can Europe sell America?

    Jan 27, 202610 min
    TrumpGreenlandEU Anti-Coercion Mechanism